I will grant that maybe the Society SHOULD CARE about the underlying investments and ask the question of where a dollar comes from that is donated to it BUT again no charity or church does that (that I know of) they don't ask an individual how they made the dollar and in this case the Society can't be blamed for refusing the money or asking about the underlying investments or management of the Trust.
Oro ...
with all due respect to your legal acumen ...
you yourself admit they "should care" where the money comes from, no matter how covertly intricately its channeled into the society's coffers. But can you say with a straight face that such a large trust donation is not even given a cursory examination to make sure that there is no chance of the 'appearance of impropriety'? We're not talking blue-haired olds ladies donating 20 bucks here. We're talking a very large (ka-ching!) donation. i'd personally accept it, scream 'hot damn!', dash off to the bank and not care one iota where it came from. But I'm just a gleefully perverted little sinner with bills to pay.
for an organization as powerful as the belfry Watchtower ... (who smugly profess to be god's sole mouthpiece and receive enlightenment from him in all matters as to how to LORD over their 6 mil slaves worldwide) ...
.... who have for decades vehemently proscribed the practice of smoking, and if I'm not mistaken, the production of tobacco in general .... to the point of shunning members and even breaking up families around this matter ....
Yes .... they should care. After all, we are talking Jehovah's Witnesses here, the one true religion, the leaders of which know all when it comes to matters of god ... these very ones ought to be held to a higher standard.
If you still can't see gross impropriety here ... then you may have bats in your watchtower too.
tSiluwe